Ramaphosa is asking the court to review and set aside Mkhwebane’s report on the CR17 election campaign funding debacle. His legal team argues that funding for political parties cannot be opened to the Public Protector’s jurisdiction.
In the report, Mkhwebane found that Ramaphosa deliberately misled Parliament by failing to disclose a R500 000 donation by Bosasa. Advocate Vincent Maleka is arguing on behalf of the Economic Freedom Fighters at the High Court in Pretoria. The review matter on the CR17 controversy by might end up in the Constitutional Court, legal representative of Amabhungane Steven Budlender has told the High Court in Pretoria.
Budlender says there is consistent confusion over the Parliamentary Code and the Executives Ethics Code when it comes to political parties and individuals’ disclosure of funding.Watch the video below for more on the story:
SABC is useless 🗽👎🏾
Our public broadcaster is already taking sides in a court process-tactical influence to the judge...close this flipping country Pls,hence pay tv license for who....exactly for this biased content?
SABC is part of the problem Azanians faced with,,
SABC why are reporting one side of the story?
The new editor Nanji Chauke seems to be a Thumamina & Jamnadas fan.
Biased is busy taking sides in their reporting. This proves the amount of state capture this country has ever had. Make sure Cyril is protected just spread the narrative about what Cyril's lawyers argued in court.
Mxm
Tell us About Muzi Sikhakhanes submissions please
What about other lawyers?
Useless SABC is doing wat is best at 🤮🤮
By the way it's Ramaphosa who is reviewing not PublicProtector this Headlines are misleading, we will do to SABC what we did Etv. LandNoli
Why only tell us about this big nose mxm.... I DNT what do u like about this corrupt Billie nx
🙄 is this the only news worthy things that transpired today in court?
This one is confused
You are useless maaan sies 🤞
Mkhwebane should go to school
Sabc now I can see there are always on the side of the president what did the lawyers of Mkhwebane said we need to hear both sides
SABC you've got no where to hide we see you. You have been telling us about Ramasende's lawyers. What about the PP lawyer? Are they not saying anything?
In th whole saga you have done a great job to clear the president, a whole public broadcaster shme
Why do you omlyvrepoet on what Ramaphosa lawyers argued? You are too biased , geez
And what is Adv Mkhwebane’s lawyer saying?
And what did AdvBMkhwebane lawyers say? Im pretty sure they also said something.
You are reporting on one side of the arguments..why Don't play to the gallery
Daily maverick 2.0
Stop your biasness, we see you bloody stratcomist
You can't win a legal battle against a billionaire.
SABC is playing politics
What about Mkhwebane's lawyers what do they say?
So Ramaphosa's lawyers are arguing alone 🤔
Mzwadile o hlolwa ke promotion tau
The SABC is so biased on this Ramaphosa thing, I suspect is that Mzwandile Mbeje guy; He has always been an ANC parrot, I don’t know why they employed him in that post.
We see you mzwaimbeje out here reporting one side of the story. What about what the other parties are saying?
you are starting to be factional , always reporting about what Ramaphosa say but not what the PP and EFF say , we are watching you👀.
Ramaphosa must go man! Ey we're tired of him already.... and I hope Mkhwebane brings him to his knees (Even though I'm not really a fan of hers)
Sabc amasimba nje fokofu vele nichemile nina nxa nisenza lima syanibuka nje nxa
Reporting one side of the story👀 yet you claim to be 'Independet & impartial'🙄
Cyril's lawyers are the only once speaking in court? Or are they the only once worth hearing?
You are only reporting one side of story,useless SABC
Ethic, something this dude has no clue of, right CyrilRamaphosa
Australia Australia Latest News, Australia Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SABC News Online - 🏆 32. / 51 Read more »
Source: SABC News Online - 🏆 32. / 51 Read more »