Ben & Jerry’s founders accuse parent company of blocking social mission

  • 📰 nypost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 67%

Australia News News

Australia Australia Latest News,Australia Australia Headlines

The Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit, filed in July, alleges that the sale violated the terms of Unilever’s takeover agreement from 2000, when the UK-based consumer goods giant bought the ice cream compan…

The co-founders of Ben & Jerry’s have accused its parent company, Unilever, of infringing on the ice cream company’s rights to control its social mission.

“Unilever has usurped their authority and reversed a decision that was made. And we can’t allow that to happen,” Cohen told MSNBC on Sunday, his first comment about the issue since the lawsuit was filed. The Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit, filed in July, alleges that the sale violated the terms of Unilever’s takeover agreement from 2000, when the UK-based consumer goods giant bought the ice cream company for $326 million.

The Ben & Jerry’s lawsuit, filed in July, alleges that the sale violated the terms of Unilever’s takeover agreement from 2000, when the UK-based consumer goods giant bought the ice cream company for $326 million.“In order for us to sell the company, it was essential that we have this unique agreement inrespected. “[They are] essentially saying, ‘well, the independent board does not matter.’”

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 91. in AU
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Because they want to sell ice-cream.

Parent company is looking out for their business interest not social BS

I question the marketing wisdom of B&J’s new Chunky Monkey Pox line of product.

Australia Australia Latest News, Australia Australia Headlines