, Twitter would merge with X Holdings II, but keep its name and general corporate structure while continuing to operate under Delaware law. X Holdings I, controlled by Musk, would then serve as the merged entity’s parent company, while X Holdings III would take on the $13 million loan that a group of big banks provided Musk to help cover the $44 billion purchase. Here’s where things get interesting.
, while X Holdings III handles the cash. The Nevada filings show this exact arrangement is no longer in efect.According to the Nevada secretary of state’s online business portal, Elon Musk registered two new businesses in the state on March 9: X Holdings Corp., and X Corp. Then, on March 15, Musk applied to merge those Nevada businesses with two of his existing companies: X Holdings I with X Holdings Corp., and Twitter Inc. with X Corp.
Twitter is censoring..... Shame on them
The social media platform formerly known as 'Twitter'?
But I’m not surprised SLATE sucks
galileocheng Such nonsense.
Australia Australia Latest News, Australia Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: futurism - 🏆 85. / 68 Read more »
PepsiCo exec on how to encourage tech transformation within a companyWith over two decades of technology implementation experience, Kanioura shared insight into how companies — big or small — can strategically implement new tools internally. Presented by sapbtp.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: hackernoon - 🏆 532. / 51 Read more »