Frontiers | Industry-specific prevalence and gender disparity of common mental health problems in the UK: A national repetitive cross-sectional study

  • 📰 medical_xpress
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 66 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 51%

Belgique Nouvelles Nouvelles

Belgique Dernières Nouvelles,Belgique Actualités

Hospitality and realestate sectors found to have highest rates of common mentalhealthproblems Cambridge_Uni frontiersin

). A cross-sectional survey of 5,497 workers found that clerical and secretarial, sales, and personal and protective services were occupations that usually had a higher prevalence of common mental health problems , whereas craft and related, and plant and machine operatives had a lower prevalence of CMHPs, compared to the overall prevalence in all adults .

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and temporal trend of CMHPs in the UK by industrial classification from 2012–2014 to 2016–2018 while evaluating the corresponding gender disparities.We used data from the Health Survey for England . HSE is a representative repeated cross-sectional survey of people aged 13 or over in England, looking at changes in the health and lifestyles of people all over the country.

This study used the survey waves of 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018, because the industrial classification has been kept as the same version since 2012, and data on CMHPs are collected every 2 years . To increase the available sample size to improve the precision of our estimates, we combined 2012 and 2014 as the starting period , as well as 2016 and 2018 as the ending period .

In this study, we only included those aged between 16 and 65, considering the legal working age and retirement age in the UK. We excluded the cases with missing values [4,379 records] instead of any imputation.. Inclusion and exclusion of the participants. HSE, Health Survey for England. This study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The data are publicly available. The use of secondary de-identified data made this study exempt from institutional review board review.

 

Merci pour votre commentaire. Votre commentaire sera publié après examen.
Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

 /  🏆 101. in BE

Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités