Dudu Myeni’s appeal shows she is still ignorant over Companies Act demands

  • 📰 BDliveSA
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 63%

Business News News

Lawyers of disgraced former SAA chair seem to have done no research into the topic of delinquent directors

The appeal by disgraced former SAA chair Dudu Myeni against the order of Judge Ronel Tolmay in the North Gauteng High Court declaring her a delinquent director — on the basis that, among other reasons, it supposedly violated her constitutional rights — clearly confirms that Myeni still has no idea of what the Companies Act expects of directors.

Myeni’s lawyers also appear to have missed the 2017 Supreme Court of Appeal decision of Gihwala vs Grancy Property Ltd, in which the directors challenged the constitutionality of the delinquency provisions of the Companies Act, without success.

Reading Judge Tolmay’s judgment one gets the impression that Myeni could not care less about the fate of SAA. The embarrassment she caused the airline and the country when she snubbed Emirates, and the fiasco with the Airbus swap, were worthy of Tolmey’s condemnation who did not mince her words about how far Myeni’s conduct fell short of the standard expected of directors.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

VusiSambo She's generally ignorant. Intellect and competence were never requirements for the positions she was given.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines