Rapid coronavirus test vs 'gold standard' PCR test: professor explains - Business Insider

  • 📰 BusinessInsider
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 51%

Business News News

A public health professor explains the difference between rapid COVID-19 tests from a pharmacy and the 'gold standard' lab results — and says people should be tested every 3 days

tested the same device in students without symptoms, and reportedly picked up just 3% of PCR-positive cases. John Deeks, professor of Biostatistics at the University of Birmingham, said in a statement to the Science Media Centre that rapid antigen tests should be, as if it were a new drug, before mass testing is rolled out.

The information is confused because the studies compare against testing PCR positive, rather than how infectious someone is. I think we should "test before you go" to workplaces where most mixing happens. And places like supermarkets. [Testing supermarket workers] will have a knock on effect of protecting the customer, and the local community. We can learn that from where the tests are first applied to very large numbers of people — what are the effects on behavior of getting a negative result?

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

SciInsider Duh!!! Unclear whether rapid tests on detect the new variants. COVID-19

horrible

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 729. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines