Companies should pay more for pollution, says UN special envoy on climate action Mark Carney

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 72%

Business Business Headlines News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Companies should be paying more for the pollution they cause, says Mark Carney, the United Nations special envoy on climate action and finance.

"They've been set far too low — single digits on average globally, well short of the estimated $80 to $100 a ton needed by the end of this decade to keep us on track to net zero," he said during a virtual event organized by the INSEAD Hoffmann Global Institute for Business and Society on Tuesday.carbon taxes should be $75 a ton by 2030.

The catastrophic impacts of climate change will largely fall on future generations, and the current generation … has few direct incentives to solve it." one of the toughest things for governments to do in order to … ensure that the longer term benefits to society are spread more immediately to those who are more impacted," he said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Yes

Does this include Chinese companies? Of course not. So we pay for their pollution and they keep on polluting. What a great economic strategy 🙄!

Companies wouldn’t pay for it. Their customers, employees, and stockholders would.

Everything obvious is revelatory once these guys and girls are out of power. Why didn’t he say this when he was the head of the Bank of England?

Maybe start with China

NO!!! Its companies should stop and will be stopped from polluting. They should noy get a free ticket to pollute just because they paid a fine...!!

'High earning corporations' Inriched by Global Citizenship Pay up gladly without remorse Triljardairs Milljardairs etc. etc. In favor of Citizenship in need ! Do this; yes you can _ Inshallah As-Salaam Aleikum _Shalom God Bless _ Namaste _ Gitche Manitou

He means pay more to the government, which is the biggest polluter. Fiat currency causes the need for constant growth and ever increasing pollution.

And where do companies get their money? Clueless! They pass all charges on to the customer smart guys!

Pay exactly who? The government? Just another way to steal our money.

With all due respect, the over regulation is why brexit happened… turning the whole world into France does not sound appealing. merci.

Tell that to China or don’t say it at all.

Who will be benefited from those tax? Government?

Never trust anyone with the designation of 'envoy'.

This dude needs to go screw himself

I’m sure you meant “ Countries” should pay more. Right. As in China, right Chloe?

So China and India keep doing what they are doing . Give me a break .

Politicians should pay a high price for destroying forests.

Americans should stop buying all the landfill products made in China

Pollution should not be free

This guy 🗨 🤔

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Mark Zandi answers when and how the U.S. will get back to businessMark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, answers some big questions about how the U.S. will get back to work. He predicts the U.S. will return to full employment by 2023, leading to a V-shaped recovery. He also suggests companies will reconsider space per employee, as well as pay, according to their new locations. Zandi predicts remote working is here to stay and that manufacturing will grow. He suggests that business leaders consider the inequities the pandemic brought to light. KenzieSigalos I agree it’s so great to take a break walk 20m and jump in the pool KenzieSigalos Long, long ago they also said two weeks to stop the spread KenzieSigalos I don't think it is temporary either. The Pandemic has fundamentally altered peoples motivations and expectations for work. The tools and resources are there to move half of all jobs to remote, we just needed the pandemic as a case study to prove it.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »