Philly News Anchor Overcomes Tech Industry’s Favorite Legal Shield in Appellate Twist

  • 📰 THR
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 30 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 53%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

In a decision that will be cheered by SAG-AFTRA, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals revives a lawsuit by Fox's Karen Hepp against Facebook.

The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has now reversed that conclusion that Section 230 applies here in a decision that not only revives her suit against Facebook, but potentially teases even higher-stake showdowns.

While Section 230 shields internet service providers from most legal claims over user content, an exception is made over intellectual property. But what does that include? All intellectual property or just IP under federal law like patents and copyrights? And, is a famous face a form of IP recognized by states like Pennsylvania? Those were the questions being handled at the 3rd Circuit in a case that drew the attention of the Screen Actors Guild.

“In our view, Facebook’s interpretation strays too far,” writes 3rd Circuit judge Thomas Hardiman in the latest opinion (

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 411. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines