Commentary: Have market forces really decided men’s tennis is more valuable than women's tennis?

  • 📰 ChannelNewsAsia
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 31 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 66%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Decisions, like scheduling women's matches when spectator numbers are at their lowest, influence which players are given the best chance of breaking through to a mass audience, says the Financial Times' John Burn-Murdoch.

and men are also given more tournaments to play in.

And in April, while the two biggest women’s tournaments offered just over US$250,000 in prize money, the men’s gave out almost US$1.4 million. It is also unclear why more time on the court should necessarily mean a better spectacle. Few of the highest-quality Grand Slam finals have gone to a deciding set and, if time was money, then Nicolas Mahut and John Isner would be the highest-paid tennis players of all time.The second response to these figures is that the free market has decided that men’s tennis is a more valuable product. But events at last month’s French Open show the holes in this theory.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines