“If we introduce a less competitive marketplace and higher prices, other telecom companies, like Bell and Telus for example, will also be able to raise prices that would benefit shareholders of those companies,” he said, adding that higher prices that may result from the merger will cause consumer loss proportional to cell spending, with less affluent households experiencing a greater impact.
Matthew Law, a lawyer for Rogers, pushed back against these claims and pointed to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission’s decision to approve the deal. Law said the regulator had evaluated how the transaction would impact consumers before the approval. “The commission examined how the transaction would affect consumer interests. It considered the possible impact of various consumer segments including low-income households, seniors and people with disabilities,” Law read from the regulator’s statement on its decision to approve the merger.
Additionally, Rogers pointed to the company’s intention to extend its Connected for Success wireline program to Western Canada if the deal is approved. The program offers high-speed internet and bundled services at a discounted price to low-income Canadians.Article content During his presentation, Osberg said the Rogers family trust and the Shaw family living trust stood to gain the most from the deal due to their concentrated holdings. Other Canadian shareholders of the merged entities would also be winners of the merger, he said.
Explain how we win
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Rogers, Shaw families stand to be 'big winners' of merger, Competition Bureau expert tells tribunalRogers\u0027 lawyer notes CRTC approved deal after considering impact on different stakeholders
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Competition Bureau expert witness in Rogers-Shaw case faces grilling at tribunalAntitrust expert said the Rogers\u002DShaw merger would eliminate the threat of Shaw as a strong fourth competitor in Canada. Read more.
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Competition Bureau expert witness in Rogers-Shaw case faces grilling at tribunalAntitrust expert said the Rogers\u002DShaw merger would eliminate the threat of Shaw as a strong fourth competitor in Canada. Read more. This deal should be terminated. Consumers will lose! If this merger will go forward then we should bring in AT&T along with Verizon.
Source: financialpost - 🏆 7. / 85 Read more »
Competition Bureau expert witness in Rogers-Shaw case faces grilling at tribunalAntitrust expert said the Rogers\u002DShaw merger would eliminate the threat of Shaw as a strong fourth competitor in Canada. Read more.
Source: calgaryherald - 🏆 64. / 52 Read more »
Rogers lawyer grills competition bureau’s experts over mobile competitionCompetition bureau’s expert tells tribunal hearing that, even with the sale of Freedom Mobile, the Rogers-Shaw merger would lead to ‘less robust’ competition in the wireless industry globebusiness I think Rogers needs a better management Rogers must be so tied up in this that they forgot to maintain their services. Starting to lose count over their widespread outages this year alone.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Rogers, Shaw merger will hurt low-income Canadians the most, tribunal hearsAn economics professor says the big winners of Rogers Communications Inc.'s $26-billion proposed takeover of Shaw Communications Inc. would be the telecoms' families and that low-income Canadians would be hit the hardest. How exactly? Rogers plans are cheaper than Shaws on almost everything. Shaw seems to raise their prices every 2 months. Flapjack92 Excuse to raise prices & fees !
Source: CTVCalgary - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »