Watsons staff upset with ‘no sitting’ rule, but company says no such policy

Health and beauty chain Watsons has said it does not have a no-sitting policy, in response to calls from employees and a workers’ rights group claiming that workers are not allowed to sit at their stations and have to stand for up to eight hours daily.

Workers Make Possible, along with a former Watsons employee, met Watsons management on Monday to discuss the issue, and also asked for workers to be given more frequent breaks. A Watsons employee, who declined to be named as she is still with the company, said she has bad aches and pain in her left leg - a result of being on her feet for hours on end.

These conditions pushed them to contact volunteer-run group Workers Make Possible, which began a campaign by putting up social media posts, among other things. The group also asked Watsons for a response in September. Mr Kumarr said: “Not letting workers sit during long shifts is a very inhumane practice. It leads to many serious health issues such as varicose veins, insufficient blood flow, severe fatigue, immobility and damage to one’s joints and tendons to name a few.

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Watsons staff upset with ‘no sitting’ rule, but company says no such policySINGAPORE - Health and beauty chain Watsons has said it does not have a no-sitting policy, in response to calls from employees and a workers’ rights group claiming that workers are not allowed to sit at their stations and have to stand for up to eight hours daily. Read more at straitstimes.com. Should all them to work for home. After all, implement the system where customers do self checkout. Then no need for staff to stand. There can’t be smoke without fire…🤔🤔🤔 I don’t see the issues here.. used to work in retail, 12 hours shift when 2 breaks for lunch and dinner.. no chairs to sit and u just stand on your shift. This is retail ..
Source: straits_times - 🏆 5. / 69 Read more »