Opinion: At mining company Sherritt, any executive pay may be too much

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 92%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Sherritt illustrates the problem matching up ‘long-term’ incentive pay for a company’s executives to the truly long-term experience for shareholders

A million bucks here and there, positive feedback from proxy-advisory services, solid shareholder support for the compensation approach in its “say on pay” vote.

However, the shares have fallen more than 97 per cent from their all-time high of $18 in October, 2007, giving it a market capitalization of less than $200-million. That return even includes an amazing 557-per-cent gain from its COVID-19 pandemic lows. To replace options, Sherritt devised a stock program that includes awards tied to how the company performs. The payouts of these performance-share units are based on two things: Sherritt’s stock returns, versus resource-industry peers; and an operational measure that considers cost savings and cash-flow generation. The company looks at results over a three-year period to calculate the final payout. Solid.

Because the plan uses relative shareholder return as a performance factor, and also pays out in shares of common stock, there can be a kind of ratcheting effect when the share price booms. A modest stock grant can explode in value. Other executives who received grants valued between $250,000 and $300,000 in 2020, some of whom also left the company, received payouts in February, 2023, of about $1.1-million.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines