The note from the unnamed company concludes with a gesture of appreciation toward the “understanding” workers: “Thanks.”“I don’t know what you’re thanking me for because I would literally never do that,” Callie told her 306k followers.
Outraged by the controversial rule, the content creator went on a rant about the company’s nonsensical reasoning for time compensation.“Like the policy would be insane enough as if it was one minute for one minute, but the fact that you’re saying for every individual minute that you are late, you have to work ten extra minutes? makes this absolutely insane.
“Is this company completely comfortable with paying all of this sudden overtime because they’re forcing employees to stay 20, 30, 40 minutes over? Because they were four minutes late for work? We’ll see how long this lasts.”The rule raised eyebrows on social media, with one user commenting, “It’s awesome when labor law violations are posted in writing.”
“If they aren’t paying OT, I’m not staying. This is a JOB, not grade school,” another person wrote, while somebody else said, “I’d be 5 mins late every day and rake in that OT. They’d change that policy real quick.”“Is this company completely comfortable with paying all of this sudden overtime because they’re forcing employees to stay 20, 30, 40 minutes over?” Cal askedMeanwhile, others found a way to exploit the policy to their advantage—not to earn extra money but to work less.
Outside of work, you can find me sweating it out in dance classes or unleashing my creativity by drawing and creating digital paintings of different characters that lives in my head. I also love spending time outdoors and play board games with my friends.By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: GlobalCalgary - 🏆 50. / 61 Read more »
Source: CBC - 🏆 32. / 63 Read more »
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »