The couple argued over the distribution of their matrimonial assets that included proceeds from the S$6.2 million sale of their house in 2022. - Photo illustration: Unsplash
She took into account the extent of each person’s contribution in terms of money and property, and looking after the welfare of the family. But it noted the channel of communications between them deteriorated as their relationship worsened, and they had been living apart for at least four years before filing for divorce.He then ran a home-delivery laundry service for a year, operated a fried noodles hawker stall for two months, and conducted ad-hoc financial futures and options markets classes for free at home for four years.
These included doing household chores, grocery shopping, overseeing renovations, planning family trips and fixing household appliances.The couple’s second and third children, their son, 30, and daughter, 25, provided evidence of their mother being a strong, reliable, available and attentive parent, who was an ever-present source of comfort for them.
The three children had also given evidence on their father’s contributions as the primary homemaker, which supported his arguments.
Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »
Source: staronline - 🏆 4. / 75 Read more »