The internet is not a free-for-all—we shouldn't let big tech companies wish copyright out of existence

  • 📰 pcgamer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 97 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 42%
  • Publisher: 67%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Jacob earned his first byline writing for his own tech blog. From there, he graduated to professionally breaking things as hardware writer at PCGamesN, and would go on to run the team as hardware editor.

For the avoidance of any copyright concerns in this article, we've decided to draw our own images representing some of the themes discussed in the story—Jacob Ridley, 2024The Coming Wave: AI, Power and the 21st Century's Greatest Dilemma.

Suleyman is at the centre of AI development today. Not only is he leading Microsoft's AI efforts, he co-founded DeepMind, which was later bought by Google, and drove Google's AI efforts, too. He's had a large part to play in how two of the largest tech firms on the planet deliver their AI systems.

Except that isn't the understanding. At least not mine, anyways, and if you've been taking content freely from anywhere on the internet this whole time, I have some very bad news for you. Copyright is automatically applied, meaning someone need not register to get it, but only applies to original works.

If I don't ask your permission and subsequently take the image or"substantial" part of it , upon finding out that I've encroached on your copyright, you could demand I remove the offending material, sue for damages, or even get an injunction banning me from publishing or repeating an offence again. The rights of some publishers to not share their content is something that Suleyman tends to agree is the case, and which has already been exploited, as he explained to CNBC :"There's a separate category where a website or a publisher or a news organisation had explicitly said do not scrape or crawl me for any other reason than indexing me so other people can find that content. That's a grey area and I think that's going to work its way through the courts.

Plenty of publishers will argue against AI systems on the finer points of these systems and what constitutes lifting and what's just taking without asking and without fair recompense—see the. I'll leave that to the lawyers. My argument is that, legal or not, an AI summarising stories with no kickback for the people working to create those stories will ultimately do a lot more harm than good in the long run.Simply put, I don't understand the argument from Suleyman here.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 38. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines