Should we leave the future of space in the hands of private companies?

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 86%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

In recent years, private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin have been carving out more territory in space exploration. Author Peter Ward joins NBCNewsTHINK to discuss what’s at stake when NASA is no longer calling the shots.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

THINK When did NASA ever bring a project in on budget? I would like to point out every NASA research and development has majority paid for by the tax payers, yet no royalties or patient were award to the government.

THINK Everything should be left to private companies. The government only rips people off and messes things up

THINK SavetheChildren, Should we leave the future in the hands of dubious personalities Follow my lawsuit against WINDSORS, POLITICANS (TRUDEAU MERKEL OBAMA PUTIN ERDOGAN… CEOs (GATES BEZOS ZUCKERBERG MUSK, BRANSON …) and COMPANYS

THINK Should we leave space for a future for private companies?

THINK Right now we're getting a lift by the Russians

THINK Yes. They get things done much sooner than NASA does.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Here are the 10 companies with the most cash on handSeveral companies, including Microsoft, Berkshire Hathaway, Alphabet and Apple are sitting on more than $100 billion dollars of cash, which is leading some on Wall Street to question why America's largest companies aren't spending. Increase marginal tax rates to 50%
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »