California sued again for requiring women on company boards

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 51%

Business News News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

California's first-in-the-nation law requiring publicly held companies to put women on their boards of directors faces a second legal challenge. A libertarian group argues that the law violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.

FILE - In this Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2018 file photo, then California Gov. Jerry Brown talks during an interview in Sacramento, Calif. California's first-in-the-nation law requiring publicly held companies to put women on their boards of directors faces its second legal challenge. Pacific Legal Foundation sued in federal court on Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2019, arguing that the law violates the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause.

The Pacific Legal Foundation provided The Associated Press with the lawsuit it filed in federal court Wednesday, arguing that the law violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. Some European countries, including Norway and France, already require corporate boards to include women. Secretary of State Alex Padilla is named in both lawsuits. He’s asking a judge to throw out the Judicial Watch lawsuit, saying taxpayers have not been harmed and thus have no standing to sue.

“I strongly believe — and significant research has shown — that this is a policy that improves a business’ performance and their bottom line,” Jackson said in a statement, noting that many companies have already voluntarily complied. The Pacific Legal Foundation’s lawsuit likely comes too late to block this year’s deadline, Boden said, but she’s hoping for a ruling before corporations are required to include more women by the end of 2021.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Yea, I can't agree with this law. This isn't school admissions or discrimination. It's like requiring that a certain percentage of Congress be something specific. It should all be based on merit

California needs to be sued or removed from the US

They're publicly held. They should be required to have board members who have the perspectives of their investors. Private companies are a different bag altogether.

I'm all for equal opportunity but to 'force' companies to be inclusive for the sake of inclusion isn't the way to do this. Instead of the stick, maybe CA should try the carrot. Incentives instead of coercion through law might yield better results.

Why stop there? Force every board to include a black person, three Asian people (Asians account for 4 bil people in the world population), someone from South America and an honorary penguin from Antarctica.

hollandcourtney Shouldn’t they also require an illegal alien in the board.

It should be who's best qualified for position not based on sex, religion or race that's true equal opportunity not giving a job to someone less fit simply to fill a quota mandated by government.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Elizabeth Warren Wants To Punish Companies Like Exxon For Lying To Federal AgenciesWarren's plan targeting companies for spreading misinformation comes as Exxon has been sued in multiple states for lying to investors about climate risks. And for manipulating the US Government! this isnt gonna cut it. if we want trump out we need to have one very solid candidate that appeals to millenials and older voters and even independents. we need to all band together behind them. these could of shitty candidates now aren't going to get him outta there.
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »