It took investors a few days, but they think they have the effect of the new coronavirus from China worked out. The broad thrust: Suppliers to China, and travel and holiday stocks, will suffer, but nasty effects for the market as a whole will be offset by central banks. The virus will be controlled enough that it won’t cause a recession in the West.
Leaving aside the heartbreak experienced by relatives and friends of those with the illness, as well as the many deaths, this coldblooded analysis rests on several assumptions...
I hope the Chinese gov. investigates the origin of this virus because given the USA propaganda and overt racism, it’s possible they brought the disease as part of the USA germ warfare against China.
There was nothing to fear except the over hyped USA all for political and economic reasons. A shameful USA could not send aid but went on a propaganda. Well China will come out stronger and again the USA have shown themselves to the Chinese people.
The Wuhan coronavirus is spreading more like influenza, which is highly transmissible, than like its slow-moving viral cousins, SARS and MERS, scientists have found. “It’s very, very transmissible, and it almost certainly is going to be a pandemic.”
I get it. There is the possibility that even if the coronavirus hits the US in a big way, it may not effect all people in the same way as it effects people in China. Different genetics. But I have to wonder if there will be a ripple effect from China's economy heading to the US
What, are we supposed to panic? Does our entire economy have to collapse over an uncertainty? WSJ must really want America to destroy itself out of a simple fear.
It’s not SARS. It’s a nasty flu. Let’s be real.
IT’S 2 AM ON SUPERBOWL SUNDAY UP .5%, HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS? WHO TOLD YOU THIS? HOW DO I GET THIS INFO?
when are they not complacent....
Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »