Barrett avoided answering questions by citing RBG, but not a valid excuse - Business Insider

  • 📰 BusinessInsider
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 51%

Canada News News

Canada Canada Latest News,Canada Canada Headlines

Amy Coney Barrett avoided answering questions from senators by citing the 'Ginsburg rule,' but legal scholars say it's not a valid excuse

Barrett cited the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in justifying why she would not answer certain questions from senators.

"Ginsburg did avoid responding to some questions in her hearing, but she also, in fact, answered others substantively. Judicial nominees have done this for decades, but it's only recently that nominees have abused this rule' to avoid answering questions in any meaningful way," Ringhand and Collins wrote.during her 1993 confirmation hearings.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

RobertTheTruth Let me guess, Trumpadites believe they know more than legal scholars as well

It was RBG's dying wish for ACB not to answer questions. Trust me.

Legal scholars lol

Ginsburg would be rolling in her grave! 😡 Amy Coney Barrett is NOT who we need to decide on Supreme Court cases, we need to move our country FORWARD!

You mean far left scholars

'legal scholars'

The liberal ones?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 729. in CA

Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Singapore Airlines fine-dining restaurant inside aircraft sells out - Business InsiderBusiness Insider is a fast-growing business site with deep financial, media, tech, and other industry verticals. Launched in 2007, the site is now the largest business news site on the web. why?
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »