Supreme Court won't overturn ruling against business that refused to serve gay weddings

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 59%

Canada News News

Canada Canada Latest News,Canada Canada Headlines

The court said Friday that it would not take up her appeal, leaving the state court rulings against her intact and again ducking the hot-button issue.

, owner of Arlene's Flowers and Gifts in Richland, Washington.

Stutzman refused to provide flowers for the wedding of two longtime male customers in 2013, explaining that as a Southern Baptist, it would violate her religious beliefs and her "relationship with Jesus Christ." Like the Colorado baker, she said her floral arrangements were works of art and that having to create them for same-sex weddings would trample on her freedom of expression.

"Religious people should be free to live out their beliefs about marriage," her lawyers said in urging the Supreme Court to hear the case. They said states have taken action against calligraphers, videographers and other business that refuse to serve same-sex weddings because of their religious beliefs.But the American Civil Liberties Union, representing Washington state, said Stutzman is not required to participate in any actual same-sex wedding ceremony.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in CA

Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court won’t overturn ruling against business that refused service for gay weddingsThe court said it would not take up the florist's appeal, leaving the state court rulings against her intact and again ducking the hot-button issue. Cancel culture Red pepper in cake unconstitutional? Let them stew in their bigotry. It does however back up the case for companies to ban trump
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »