Apple’s Privacy Change Is Hitting Tech and E-Commerce Companies. Here’s Why.

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 12 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 8%
  • Publisher: 63%

Canada News News

Canada Canada Latest News,Canada Canada Headlines

Privacy changes Apple rolled out in the spring are disrupting the online ad market, hurting e-commerce players and creating challenges for tech companies including Facebook and Snap

Loose-leaf tea seller Plum Deluxe used to gain a new customer for every $27 it spent on Facebook and Instagram ads. Then, Apple Inc. introduced a privacy change restricting how users are tracked on mobile devices.

Now, the company spends as much as $270 to pick up a new customer. “That’s a huge jump and one that we just can’t absorb,” said Andy Hayes, founder of Plum Deluxe of Portland, Ore., which is now cutting its spending.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in CA
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I'm playing the world's smallest violin for them. Maybe they'll give up and close shop? Or they will adapt like everyone and everything else. lol

Apple's recent changes to its privacy policy have allowed their users to maintain their privacy. This may benefit the consumer, but ad agencies are in a lot of trouble. Data tracking has become much more costly and inefficient due to this change. pierremascetti Mike_Wertz13

Woo-hoo...if WSJ is against these updates...they MUST be excellent.

Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Snap Shares Slide as It Blames Apple’s Privacy Changes for Hurting Its Ad BusinessSnap said revenue rose 57% in the latest quarter, but it expects growth to slow due to Apple's privacy changes. Shares were down 27% in after-hours trading.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »