Why a business owner who paid himself dividends got into trouble with the CRA

  • 📰 VancouverSun
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 41 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 61%

Canada News News

Canada Canada Latest News,Canada Canada Headlines

Why a business owner who paid himself dividends got into trouble with the CRA — via financialpost taxes CRA dividends

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.Section 160, also known as the “joint liability rule,” gives the CRA the power to hold an individual liable for the tax debts of someone with whom they have a non-arm’s length relationship if they’ve been involved in a transaction seen to avoid tax.

Four criteria must be met for the CRA to successfully win a joint-liability assessment: there must have been a transfer of property; the transferor and the transferee must not have been dealing at arm’s length; there must not have been adequate consideration paid by the transferee to the transferor; and the transferor must have had an outstandingThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Three of the four section 160 criteria listed above were clearly met, but the taxpayer and the CRA disagreed as to whether or not the taxpayer provided consideration for the property transferred to him by the corporation and, if so, whether the fair market value of that consideration exceeded the fair market value of the property transferred to him.Article content

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 49. in CA

Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Why a business owner who paid himself dividends got into trouble with the CRAThe Canada Revenue Agency doesn\u0027t consider a dividend a legal remuneration, which can have severe implications. Jamie Golombek explains.
Source: fpinvesting - 🏆 43. / 63 Read more »