The US government says women's underwear should cost more than men's | CNN Business

  • 📰 cnni
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 59%

Canada News News

Canada Canada Latest News,Canada Canada Headlines

The average US tariff rate on women’s undergarments is 15.5%, compared to just 11.5% for men’s. That means women are being charged a tax that’s 35% higher, according to Ed Gresser, director for Trade and Global Markets at the Progressive Policy Institute.

The average US tariff rate on women’s undergarments is 15.5%, compared to just 11.5% for men’s. That means women are being charged a tax that’s 35% higher than what their male counterparts pay, according to Ed Gresser, a former US trade official and current director for Trade and Global Markets at the Progressive Policy Institute. “Worst Valentine’s Day surprise ever,” wrote Gresser in his report, as he estimated that the current US tariff system adds about $1.

5% on bras and corsets in Europe compared with flat rates of 9% and 12% for the rest. A lacy dilemma Shopping for lingerie in the United States presents the rare case when the best deal isn’t the no-frills one. Literally. Tariffs on US underwear are regressive, meaning that cheap materials tend to be taxed more than fancy, expensive fabrics. That likely comes from US manufacturers feeling more threatened by overseas competitors making cheap undies for the masses, as opposed to luxury goods.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 326. in CA
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Really You call this land of the free Hone of the brave

this is only news for men. women know this.

It's a hidden tax of the free womb they get at birth! FemalePrivilege

That’s because mens only have two pairs and just turned them inside out.

They can pay less for basic underwear, I've seen it, they just like to pay more for ones that; fits better/ more lace/ less lace/ g string etc.

Women pay more for they draws anyway cuz they come in a set 😭🤣😭🤣

Damn men! Get rid of them all.

Report on this

For one sec I thought i am on Jerry Springer show until I read CNN.

Now that's equality for you! Let's add those tampons etc to the list and see how much something that is essential to a women's health + wellbeing are taxed.

Tariffs are a tax and taxationistheft

Define woman

Or maybe it's because women's panties cost more to MAKE than men's? I realize that kind of economic analysis is beyond anyone on CNN's payroll.

theirs is more of a luxury product though. Also, what is a woman? How dare you claim only women wear these things. Men do to.

Now it is gender equality they can try ours 😂

NielsenIQ data shows that average prices rose 9.8% for tampons and 8.3% for a package of menstrual pads this year through May 28 2022 not to mention shortages. Young women at times need to resort to TP wadding, if they are working poor.

Meanwhile; OhioChernobyl

Lmao they are better materials... dude wear 1 ply underwear not all that fancy crap. Gotta love CNN always covering the big stories.

not saying its right but women clothes are more fancy then mens jeans and tee shirts lol

mens underwear typically is not fancy and laced.

underwear is getting so expensive, I am thinking of ceasing to wear any. lol

Disgusting 🤮

And their haircuts cost more too geez what are we a fucking comminist society now?

This is below average reporting...even for CNN.

Good to know. I say stop buying until they are forced to change their pricing. Most women have more clothes than we need anyway.

considering theres lots more of it it should. woke fjb

Why don't you just do the simple math, it's 4 cents more on the dollar 🙄 why try to make it so complicated

Baby got back.

On imported undergarments. Lesson? Ladies who buy American do not pay a higher tax rate for undergarments.

This is not new.

Well, it IS comparing a two piece garment against a one piece one. That's already more material needed. 👙 🩲

😂😂😂

People will have to stay 'commando' with no inner wears at this rate, if they haven't already started. ✌️

It's absurd.

How much tax income is there on other woman hygiene products compared to men? And what is the income difference between men and woman?

But, I thought TFG said tariffs were supposed to be paid by the seller, not the consumer? What gives... surely he didn't lie to us?

It must be sexism right? Slow news day for the fake news

Prices will never change on anything, or even return to normal, until we stop buying these items If you want lower prices on food, household items, clothing, stop paying these prices! Economics is just Supply and demand

Supply and demand law

Fantastic reporting!! Riveting!! What a joke

We now control their private parts, next up is their underwear!

Same at the cleaners.

Plain shorts v lingerie Try going commando

Total Media Blackout on the Vinyl Chloride Phosgene Disaster in Ohio

Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Sports gambling sites cash in on Super Bowl betting mania | CNN BusinessWith more states legalizing gambling on sports, Super Bowl LVII will probably be the biggest event for the industry ever. The American Gaming Association is predicting that more than 50 million people will bet about $16 billion on the National Football League championship game between the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles. And the sky will be blue And nobody knows who plays! Why are you not covering the train derailment and massive toxic explosion in Ohio?
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Super Bowl ad slams Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' tech | CNN BusinessElectric carmaker Tesla will face a hit on Super Bowl Sunday, when an ad will play showing the alleged dangers of its Full Self-Driving technology. Probably paid for by the US administration Not a fan of Teslas, either way we are going to have a plan. World Oil Reserves: The world has proven reserves equivalent to 46.6 times its annual consumption levels. This means it has about 47 years of oil left. Like Sara said, if there going after you your probably doing something right!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

What the M&M's commercial shows about Super Bowl ads today | CNN BusinessThe much-hyped M&M's SuperBowl commercial that was supposed to clarify the status of the brand's 'spokescandies,' which were put on pause after they were criticized by right-wing pundits, finally aired on Sunday, and it was, well, confusing. I’ve been an m&m lover for 40+ years. But now I’m boycotting them for being woke and ridiculous. IAmSophiaNelson Which means it was a waste of (BIG) money. Boring! Bring the M&M’s Characters again.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Knights, squires, queens go on strike at California Medieval Times | CNN BusinessWorkers at a Southern California Medieval Times have walked off the job and went on strike before their second performance of the day Saturday, the union confirmed. Good for them Big CRAPPY NEWS NETWORK worthy news, hence your ratings! Oh no. What will we do...
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Alibaba sells remaining stake in top Indian online payment provider Paytm | CNN BusinessChinese e-commerce giant Alibaba has sold its remaining stake in Paytm, India's top digital payment app, as it gradually divests from its Indian investments amid friction between Beijing and New Delhi.
Source: cnni - 🏆 326. / 59 Read more »

Banning TikTok in the US 'should be looked at,' says Schumer | CNN BusinessA proposal to ban TikTok in the United States “should be looked at,” according to US Senator Chuck Schumer. Boomer catches up to what people have been talking about for 2 years. More from the party of small government. Now they wanna say what you can and can't have on your phone. Next comes banning all but 'government approved' media Ban facebook and Instagram also
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »