Questions over who gave permission, and whether the occupation should be declared to Sars as a fringe benefitInsiders at the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa claim that board chair Leonard Ramatlakane is getting a leg up from taxpayers after he moved
his family into a posh property belonging to the struggling state-owned entity...You’ve always trusted us to help you navigate the world. Support the Sunday Times by becoming a premium member for only R80 and keep the conversation going. You can cancel anytime.
Just some bitter, jealous & most likely useless employees
And we carry on voting for the cadres and still ask why every SOE is stuffed.
But m worried how this media houses label every black professionals as the criminals,but labeled André as Godsend after collapsing Eskom
Any investigations being conducted?
Eish
What's stoping the authorities to arrest him. A criminal belongs in jail if there is proof.
If it was De Ryter there won’t be anything to write about. Sis junk mail
What about the other crooks Roy Moodely don’t hear anything about that corruption
Is Leonard Ramatlakane a communist?
lavitosoul Leonard Ramatlakane has ALWAYS been a criminal. What do you expect. This is just the tip of the iceberg of his crime. You will hear in the next two years how this man is looting PRASA dry
It’s the African way … take as much as you can and F the rest
Does a PRASA board chair earn enough to afford an own house ?
If it is park of the package he has as board chair, I see no reason why you should insinuate that his occupation of the house is wrong.
Why does broke PRASA own a house?
The people will not help capitalists kill SOEs. It's that simple. Ask De Ruyter to pay back the R5 billion he failed to recover at Eskom. It's a bigger story than this Prassa guy
Why should Prada be owning mansions, for what? Being a chair does not qualify him for such benefits……..
It again highlights the state of corruption in all SOE'S and government.
While Transnet pensioners can't even afford food.
What a lucky guy… and look at all those beautiful potholes and failing infrastructure around his house… another proud South African
... at least it will be occupied and maintained, rather than thieves helping themselves to its windows, doors etc.
You’re annoying us with these petty issues really
What was the purpose of this property when it's purchased?
What if the house was just vacant? Would you prefer that it remains vacant or someone uses it?
And then
Have you ever tried to dig up dirt on de Ruyter when he was GCEO of Eskom or it only applies to black executives?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
I don’t see anything wrong honestly