have inevitably invited every tech commentator on the interwebs to posit a theory as to what should be done next with the troubled chipmaker. While Intel itself seems to beto survive, several former executives have made their opinions known as to whether carving the company up is the best way forward, or whether that's a terrible idea for both Intel and the US as a whole.).
Should the same happen to Intel's foundry business, the US would then be reliant on TSMC and Samsung to produce advanced chips. This reliance on foreign suppliers would leave the US vulnerable to geopolitical changes,Both sides of the argument make good points.
So, the ongoing"how do you solve a problem like Intel" debate continues, and some heavyweight names have made their opinions publicly known. Whether the US would be prepared to intervene and force Intel to split itself in two seems dependent on what decisions Intel makes internally next, and whether it decides to sell off its foundry business to keep afloat in the meantime.
The bloated tyranny of two-factor authentication is ruining my online existence. There has to be a better way