More companies are using tools that deploy AI to build candidate profiles and weed out job applicants based on data like facial micro expressions, or what they share on social media. But is this practice fair?

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 63%

Canada News News

Canada Canada Latest News,Canada Canada Headlines

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

They will "weed out" all but the sociopaths. Good job!

No it isn't fair. How does a person's personal life impact their job performance unless they are racist, sexist or otherwise discriminate based on creed, nationality, orientation, etc and their environment is one of diversity. I am just happy I live in the working class world.

Yikes!

Yes

AI means $NVDA

Better question: Is it productive? It sounds like a great way to weed out all the minds sharp enough to see through your bullshit.

Dollars to donuts white faces will be the "standard", and the algorithms will weed out non-white faces. And, the developers won't even realize it.

"Do androids dream of electric sheep?" No, not after we smash their circuit boards to smithereens.

Open the pod bay doors Hal. Dave, you know I can't do that.

"facial micro expressions" "share on social media" Sounds like a bunch of useless automated bullshit to me. And look at how well that turned out for YouTube.

So many lawsuits. So little money.

It’s not only unfair, it’s cowardly and stupid.

Unfair and inevitable.

I don't trust the wall street journal. Period.

We're on our way to Gattacaworld.

No. It’s stupid.

So, Cambridge Analytical? For getting a job?

The answer to that question is immediately apparent to everyone except, apparently, the WSJ.

NO!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in CA

Canada Canada Latest News, Canada Canada Headlines