In court papers filed on December 21 through lawyers Atherstone & Cook, DIDG claimed the cancellation was “grossly unreasonable” and argued that they did not breach any of the tender conditions.
“The termination was irregular in that the decision to terminate was not made by [NRZ] but was made by external forces including the minister of transport,” DIDG alleged in court papers.
Wir haben diese Nachrichten zusammengefasst, damit Sie sie schnell lesen können. Wenn Sie sich für die Nachrichten interessieren, können Sie den vollständigen Text hier lesen. Weiterlesen:
We need to sue them more billions for their citizens destroying our rail infrastructure