at claimed to have tipped the balance in the debate about the virus’ origins.
Both were previously posted as “preprints” but have now been vetted by scientific peer review and appear in a prestigious journal. This required neighborhood-level study within Wuhan to be more certain the virus was “zoonotic” — that it jumped from animals to people. The tightly confined early cases contrasted with how it radiated throughout the rest of the city by January and February, which the researchers confirmed by drilling into social media check-in data from the Weibo app.
Cause we didn’t already know this
'new studies show' 🚩🚩🚩🚩
🤣😂 What a load of 🐴🐴💩💩 When are Journalists going to start telling the actual truth, never to be honest as MEDIA received vasts amounts of €€££$$ pre this alleged Virus.
University of Arizona, impartial then...
China in Ukrainian you mean . 🐍
So it was the bats 🦇🦇 after all
Ah yea the animal market just up the road from coronavirus lab? Don't trust 'studies' anymore, academia and media completely corrupted, Journal likely paid to publish this
After some dude caught it in the lab and went down there for his dinner of fried dog
Sooooo, we're back to blaming the Chinese and not Ukrainian biolabs? Hunter Biden!
Tell us something we don't know.
Oh watch all the loons lose their shit in the comments 🤣🤣
More lies fauci released it from the lab
Seriously The Journal are still pretending the 'virus came from wet market' lie. Does the journal just lie about everything Also, who authored the article? No journalist brave (or stupid) enough to take the credit for this garbage
I'll wait here for the experts to arrive
Bollox, they (Chinese) have been hiding something since the beginning. It started in a lab. They've no choice but to make sure it comes out as a natural origin