Constitutional Court still to confirm ruling on Mkhwebane's suspension being lifted - SABC News - Breaking news, special reports, world, business, sport coverage of all South African current events. Africa's news leader.

  • 📰 SABCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 51%

Deutschland Nachrichten Nachrichten

Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten,Deutschland Schlagzeilen

The Constitutional Court still needs to confirm the Western Cape High Court’s decision to set aside President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to suspend Busisiwe Mkhwebane as the Public Protector.

Suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s at Committee Room M46 during lunch break attending the proceedings of the Section 194 Inquiry into her fitness to hold office, 17 August 2022.Suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s at Committee Room M46 during lunch break attending the proceedings of the Section 194 Inquiry into her fitness to hold office, 17 August 2022.

Western Cape High Court’s decision to set aside her suspensionThe Constitutional Court will need to confirm the latest order before it is enforced. Mkhwebane maintains that her suspension was conducted in an unlawful and rushed manner. Mkhwebane says, “I am so thankful. The judgment found that the President hurried in the nature of the suspension of the applicant in the circumstances and notwithstanding there was a judgment that was looming on the same subject, which leads this court to a conclusion that the suspension may have been retaliatory and hence unlawful. So, in our view, the President could not bring an unbiased mind as he was conflicted.

“This order is effective from today, the judgment is very clear. There’s the part of the constitutional provision, even if the order was solely based on the conduct, it is an order in terms of section 172 b and not section 172 a. And for the avoidance of any doubt, the order is also based not only on the constitutional grounds but also on common law grounds, including actual bias and even possible ulterior motives.

Wir haben diese Nachrichten zusammengefasst, damit Sie sie schnell lesen können. Wenn Sie sich für die Nachrichten interessieren, können Sie den vollständigen Text hier lesen. Weiterlesen:

 /  🏆 37. in DE
 

Vielen Dank für Ihren Kommentar.Ihr Kommentar wird nach Prüfung veröffentlicht.

Captured

There is no such thing. Lies

I think it will help if sabc news reader can read the judgment before calling the so called expert to comment.The Application before court was in terms of section 172(1) and not 172(2).172(1) doesn't need referal.

confirm what

Why are you not aknowledging victory and avoid tainting it with a 'but effect'. Is it what you call reporting without fear or favour. In the match of PP v President the PP came victorious full stop. If it goes to the captured CC let it be. You saying the president may win at CC.

Media likes to mislead peeps about, Courts judgement.

But that does not mean that she can’t go back to work based on the other common law leg of the judgement which needs no CC confirmation!

It will be great if you cite your authority when you opine on legal matters. Same if you give opinions on physics, medicine, etc.

Lols Concort will review on 20 October n bring confirmation on 25 March 2023

Go back to your office AdvBMkhwebane and fight for the proletariat and the working class, against those who see themselves as powerful and untouchable.

Nyaya yanetsa iyi

Simza_396225 What do make of the DA appeal then?

U lying!! Where does it say that in the judgment? Was this based k s172(1) or s172(2) ? Learn to hv independent reporting, not following karynmaughan

No it doesn't.

No you got it wrong. Adv Mkhwebana need to report to work on Monday Cyril Ramaphosa is abusing his power with his team DA

That's not true. The WHC judgment is effective, otherwise why waste money on High Court if the Judgement still needs to be confirmed in the Concourt?..... U are trying to render the High Court's Jurisdiction useless.

Their is nothing like the confirmation here, cct confirmation if they can jagde different from the WC high court, will take away the liberty of WC high Court decision, pp she should be going back to her position only

She's harder to get rid of than a stalker.

Are confuse , while is waiting the concourt she can go to work as the decision to suspend her is invalid.

Confirm what now You're lying siees!!

Bull shit

I was scammed through Bitcoin couple of months ago, I started hating Bitcoin until I was introduced to AntonHendrikfx, and I gave Bitcoin trading another try, I successfully withdrew $35,000 after two weeks of trading, am so grateful AntonHendrikfx thank you

White media is a constitution of SA, they say things and that's how the country must dance😏😏, SA is a mess with this bully of phalaphala.

Fake news

Doesn't she serve at the pleasure of the president?

Where are you getting that, is it Karyn SC ? The judgement specifically quotes section 172(1) and not 2.this does not require conncourt.

As a mother of two kids I have battled alot with my financial state to the point of begging from friends just to survive,until I started Bitcoin trading with the help of AntonHendrikfx made a successful withdrawal of R 200,000 with the help of AntonHendrikfx

Says who? 😂

So every decision taken by courts gets the nod from the constitutional court to be implemented or not?

SABC News stop peddling lies. Mxn. Did you even read the judgment.

So because of this judgment the whole nation is punished with loadshedding. We are tired being treated like dogs in our own country.

Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen