Why diamonds cost way more than they’re worth — thanks to this shrewd British company

  • 📰 nationalpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 80%

Deutschland Nachrichten Nachrichten

Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten,Deutschland Schlagzeilen

You know how you’re supposed to spend two months’ salary on an engagement ring? It’s not in the Bible. It’s not some Ancient Welsh proverb. DeBeers invented that

In this episode of Everything Should Be Better, Tristin Hopper explains how a company convinced the world to spend two month’s salary on a diamond engagement ring. Watch the video above, or read the transcript below.

Weird, right? The only reason you’re paying thousands of dollars for a tiny, not-tremendously special gemstone is because a very shrewd British company tricked you into doing it. But that didn’t happen to diamonds. Instead, this guy entered the picture: Cecil Rhodes. You may have heard of the Rhodes Scholarship or Rhodesia. Same guy.

Here’s some wedding rings from the early to mid 19th century. Notice anything? Not really a lot of diamonds, are there? There were some diamonds, to be sure, but they weren’t the central feature of the ring. DeBeers’ cartel has now been broken. There are now diamond mines all over the world outside their control, including some big ones right here in Canada. We’re also pretty good at manufacturing diamonds artificially. Take a bunch of carbon, squeeze it real tight and, bingo, diamond.

Wir haben diese Nachrichten zusammengefasst, damit Sie sie schnell lesen können. Wenn Sie sich für die Nachrichten interessieren, können Sie den vollständigen Text hier lesen. Weiterlesen:

 /  🏆 10. in DE
 

Vielen Dank für Ihren Kommentar.Ihr Kommentar wird nach Prüfung veröffentlicht.

Diamonds really aren’t “worth” anything

Deutschland Neuesten Nachrichten, Deutschland Schlagzeilen