The 6-3 decision Monday divided the court along ideological lines as the justices agreed that the somewhat obscure section of the law violates the Constitution.The case may be important for some candidates for federal office who want to make large loans to their campaigns.
The Biden administration had defended the provision as an anti-corruption measure, and in a dissent Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the majority, in striking it down, “greenlights all the sordid bargains Congress thought right to stop.” "In discarding the statute, the Court fuels non-public-serving, self-interested governance. It injures the integrity, both actual and apparent, of the political process," Kagan wrote.
turdcruz works harder than the devil AND Kris Jenner to put money in his own pocket.
Hunh. A bought white supremacist majority backs a white supremacist. Who would think? The Supreme Court is absolutely corrupted by dark money. We either take it back and wipe out the donors or we sit back and just watch it happen.
Their system works. Shocker.
🤦♀️
مصر أحدث الأخبار, مصر عناوين
Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.
مصدر: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 اقرأ أكثر »