, 13 federal district judges, and the US Department of Justice have all agreed these cases should be heard in state courts.
Dr. Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, told, “The supreme court’s decision today is a significant victory for climate justice and climate lawsuits filed across the United States and around the world. The communities involved in this case suffered unimaginable losses due, in large part, to the recklessness and greed of the fossil fuel industry, and now they are one step closer to having their day in court.
“As we become more adept at identifying the specific contributions of individual companies to the climate crisis through attribution science, we are increasingly able to trace the lines of responsibility from the boardrooms of fossil fuel companies to the shattered homes and lives of those harmed by climate change.
In March, the Biden administration urged the Supreme Court not to take up the appeal by Exxon and Suncor, because it said that no federal questions had been raised in the litigation. That marked a reversal of the position taken by the Trump administration when the Supreme Court last considered the issue.has filed suit under the RICO act, alleging they are nothing more than racketeers and gangsters.
مصر أحدث الأخبار, مصر عناوين
Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.
مصدر: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 اقرأ أكثر »
Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal courtThe U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...
مصدر: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 اقرأ أكثر »