Poultry companies ask judge to dismiss ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed

  • 📰 wjxt4
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 27 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 63%

مصر أخبار أخبار

مصر أحدث الأخبار,مصر عناوين

A group of poultry producers, including the world’s largest, are asking a federal judge to dismiss his ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed.

FILE - A Tyson food product is seen in Montpelier, Vt., Nov. 18, 2011. The world's largest poultry producer and other poultry companies are asking a federal judge to dismiss his ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed. Arkansas-based Tyson Foods, Minnesota-based Cargill Inc. and the others say in a motion filed Thursday, Oct. 26, 2023, that the case is constitutionally moot because the evidence is now more than 13 years old.

The filing said Oklahoma conservation officials have noted a steady decline in pollution. It credited improved wastewater treatment plants, state laws requiring poultry-litter management plans and fewer poultry farms as a result of growing metropolitan areas in northwest Arkansas. “The Court’s findings and conclusions rest upon a record compiled in 2005–2009,” the poultry companies' motion stated. “When this Court issued its findings and conclusions ... much of the record dated from the 1990s and early 2000s.”

لقد قمنا بتلخيص هذا الخبر حتى تتمكن من قراءته بسرعة. إذا كنت مهتمًا بالأخبار، يمكنك قراءة النص الكامل هنا. اقرأ أكثر:

 /  🏆 246. in EG
 

شكرًا لك على تعليقك. سيتم نشر تعليقك بعد مراجعته.

مصر أحدث الأخبار, مصر عناوين

Similar News:يمكنك أيضًا قراءة قصص إخبارية مشابهة لهذه التي قمنا بجمعها من مصادر إخبارية أخرى.

Poultry companies ask judge to dismiss ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershedA group of poultry producers, including the world’s largest, are asking a federal judge to dismiss his ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed. Arkansas-based Tyson Foods, Minnesota-based Cargill Inc. and the others say in a motion filed Thursday that the case is “constitutionally moot” because the evidence is now more than 13 years old. U.
مصدر: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 اقرأ أكثر »