Jack Daniel's, Arizona pet toymaker square off in Supreme Court in trademark fight - Phoenix Business Journal

By Tristan Richards – Cronkite NewsWASHINGTON – The Supreme Court will consider whether an Arizona manufacturer of pet toys infringed on Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 trademark with its Bad Spaniels Old No. 2 squeaky toy for dogs.

to the Supreme Court, they said that while “everyone likes a good joke,” VIP Products “confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel’s hard-earned good will.” The legal fight began in 2014, when Jack Daniel’s wrote to VIP demanding that the company stop producing Bad Spaniels. VIP went to court, seeking a declaration that its toy did not infringe on the distiller’s trademark, and Jack Daniel’s countersued.

He pointed to the district court judge’s second ruling, where the judge “said it’s hard to imagine that any trademark owner could prevail except in the most egregious of circumstances and …only by going to the Supreme Court or Congress.”

España Últimas Noticias, España Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

Supreme Court takes up Jack Daniel's case against dog toy companyJack Daniel's is arguing an Arizona-based company is breaking federal trademark laws with dog toys that resemble their iconic whiskey bottle. How dare they besmirch alcohol with a dog toy? Alcohol is supposed to facilitate the assault of teenage girls. Brett Kavanaugh is rolling over in his BEACH WEEK calendar. 你不过我都忘记了 我今晚喝一点杰克丹尼 😆😆😆😆😆 The court is 100% corrupt
Fuente: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Leer más »