Chemerinsky: Supreme Court went out of its way to ignore common sense on bump stocks

  • 📰 mercnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 68%

España Noticias Noticias

España Últimas Noticias,España Titulares

By rejecting a clear interpretation, conservative majority protects gun rights and puts lives in needless jeopardy.

A North Raleigh Guns employee demonstrates how a bump stock works at the Raleigh, N.C., shop on Feb. 1, 2013.

A bump stock, however, allows a semiautomatic gun to repeatedly fire, at nearly the rate of a machine gun. A rifle equipped with a bump stock can fire at a rate of between 400 and 800 rounds per minute. The new ATF rule made enormous sense. A weapon outfitted with a bump stock is for all intents and purposes a machine gun; common sense dictates that it should fall under the federal ban. As Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent on Friday, “When I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.”

Both Thomas’ majority opinion and Sotomayor’s dissent include detailed descriptions of how bump stocks work. Both agree, and it is unassailable, that bump stocks allow a semiautomatic weapon to perform as a machine gun though the mechanics are slightly — very slightly — different. And it also is undeniable that such weapons can kill a large number of people in a short amount of time.

Hemos resumido esta noticia para que puedas leerla rápidamente. Si estás interesado en la noticia, puedes leer el texto completo aquí. Leer más:

 /  🏆 88. in ES
 

Gracias por tu comentario. Tu comentario será publicado después de ser revisado.

España Últimas Noticias, España Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

The Supreme Court went out of its way to ignore common sense on bump stocksThe only explanation for the Supreme Court's 6-3 bump stock decision is that the ultraconservative majority supports gun rights virtually without question.
Fuente: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Leer más »