Michael Jackson's companies had no duty to protect Australian boy from alleged sexual abuse, judge rules

  • 📰 abcnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 13 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 9%
  • Publisher: 83%

France Nouvelles Nouvelles

France Dernières Nouvelles,France Actualités

Brisbane-born Wade Robson's lawyers vow to take his case to the US Supreme Court if necessary, after a judge dismisses his case over allegations Michael Jackson abused him as a child.

The dismissal came after the judge dismissed a similar lawsuit in October by James Safechuck. Both men made their allegations in the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland.

"If allowed to stand, the decision would set a dangerous precedent that would leave thousands of children working in the entertainment industry vulnerable to sexual abuse by persons in places of power," Mr Finaldi said in a statement.

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

 /  🏆 5. in FR
 

Merci pour votre commentaire. Votre commentaire sera publié après examen.

The sexual abuse stuff it a total fabrication. Lol there is not a single piece of evidence. Wade Robson is a liar, they both are. I’ve looked into it and it astounds me how gullible people are. Just extraordinary

Consider doing better research and reporting.

holy shit the spin, this is how you lose credibility.

Gross, ABC. And you’re supposed to be the one (reasonably) reliable independent Australian media outlet. Please re-write your headlines. “Extortionists against MJ Estate dismissed again” might be a suggestion.

US Supreme Court ?! Nice to see Robson's lawyer in performative mode. There is no way this stands a chance - zero credibility. Your article reports on the technicality issue, but gives none of the backstory. It's over for Mr Robson.

Who ? (A real musical force).

Here’s a more accurate headline “Judge dismisses Wade Robson’s $850 million dollar lawsuit, for the THIRD time”

What a weird angle to have as your headline? how about reporting on the mamy inconsistencies and times the judge court the accuser lying under oath?But of course you go with the angle as if he is guilty, when the fact is, every MJ accuser has always sought money first.

When are companies ever responsible for criminal acts by an employee if it's not directly related to crimes in the businesses portfolio? We don't blame truck companies when driver have a crash while drunk / on drugs...

No, Nobody on Earth is responsible for sexual abuse of children because the justice system does it too and it's legal

Watch 'Square One: Michael Jackson' on Amazon Prime or Tubi or YouTube to understand why is MJInnocent and why years later Wade and James are now dismissed. This documentary is full of true facts based off from the court documents and the FBI files.

Leaving Neverland was the last desperate roll of the dice by two liars, perjurers, false accusers & failed extortionists in serious financial debt to the Estate of Michael Jackson. It failed. Three dismissals, two different judges time to get a real job.

France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités