The Commission found that he was in breach of his constitutional, legislative and ethical duties.A significant portion of the evidence against Zuma on Bosasa is hearsay, but hearsay evidence is admissible in the Commission’s proceedings.
The Commission said that on its own required Zuma to come forward and explain publicly and on oath how that spending was justified, how it was dealt with in terms of the Executive Ethics Code and that it was not reciprocated with any form of quid pro quo.There is no evidence to suggest direct facilitation by the then President Zuma of the unlawful award of any of the tenders discussed above to Bosasa. Nor is there any evidence of his having facilitated the award of any other tenders.
There are reasonable grounds to suspect that Zuma’s conduct was in breach of his obligations as President under the Constitution, in breach of his obligations under the Executive Ethics Code and in breach of legislation. Having regard to the nature of the relationship between Zuma and Bosasa, as revealed by the evidence, Zuma placed himself in a conflict of interest situation.
Good news for the country and the nation. This had been a very expensive exercise of all times to seek justice for the nation. Likewise, the return for investment must exceed the expectations. It can't be enough for money to pursued, orange overalls must be won for years too.
The never ending story. A major production.
He should call that thing a gossip column. A very expensive gossip column.
So what, are we going to see action or we will wait for December elections?
France Dernières Nouvelles, France Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
La source: SABCNews - 🏆 37. / 51 Lire la suite »
La source: ITNewsAfrica - 🏆 27. / 59 Lire la suite »