Meta vs the FTC: Meta claims WhatsApp and Insta acquisition wasn't monopolistic

  • 📰 PhoneArena
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 29 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 59%

Apps Berita

Vs

Izzy, a tech enthusiast and a key part of the PhoneArena team, specializes in delivering the latest mobile tech news and finding the best tech deals. Her interests extend to cybersecurity, phone design innovations, and camera capabilities.

Meta and the FTC are currently in a legal fight over whether or not Meta acquiring WhatsApp and Instagram was a monopolistic move. The FTC claims that the practice was indeed monopolistic, but Meta is trying to dismiss this claim,In the ongoing legal battle, Meta claims that Instagram and WhatsApp's acquisition was to the benefit of consumers. The company has now filed a motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit against the US FTC.

The second point Meta makes is that its acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram has benefited consumers. As the company claims, it has spent"billions of dollars" and invested"millions of hours" to make both these apps better, more reliable, and more secure. Meta claims that in the FTC complaint, the market definitions are"unreasonably narrow". It seems like the FTC has excluded platforms like TikTok and YouTube from the market it is focusing on. The market instead only includes Facebook, Insta, Snapchat, and MeWe, claims Meta.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

 /  🏆 322. in İD
 

Terima kasih atas komentar Anda. Komentar Anda akan dipublikasikan setelah ditinjau.

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama