that apartheid was not a crime against humanity which he later retracted.
Steenhuisen says he has categorically stated that De Klerk was wrong in his denialism of the evils of the system, but believes that the discussion should have focused on apartheid’s legacy rather than its labelling. President Cyril Ramaphosa has criticised South Africans who he says still think apartheid was not a crime against humanity.
That but is loaded we know. So don't bother.
No different from Helen Zille.
It's legacy🤔,letf us landless and spectators in the economy of the country😠
Male Zille
He must just shut up. He never experienced apartheid in the first place and thus he will never understand as to how we feel.
Does he has nothing to speak? He is only making things worse by rubbing salt in a wound. He is indeed a total disaster this one.
As a politician, when you keep quiet, it says more than when you speak !
Tell him to go to school first, so that he can learn history and evidences of Apartheid evil Misplaced by who ? ANSWER is the Apartheid party call DA
The question remains Mr Steenhuisen, do you agree that Apartheid was crime against humanity? Or you can explain.