Is A Private Company’s Automated Dialing Making It Impossible To Reach The IRS?

Call EnQ will cut hold times on these lines by as much as 90%. While the methods used to achieve these results are proprietary, at its most basic level Call EnQ uses banks of computerized auto-dialers to repeatedly call IRS customer service lines including the PPL, which is supposed to be used exclusively by tax practitioners actively working to resolve a client matter. The Call EnQ algorithm may also increase call frequency during known busy times.

So what is the IRS doing about this? There may not be much they can do. Phyllis Jo Kubey, an Enrolled Agent in New York, New York, noted that her IRS Stakeholder Liaison indicated that IRS agents have been instructed to disconnect from calls that have clearly been placed by certain auto dialing services. The guidance is even provided in the Internal Revenue Manual

... therefore you cannot make payments or check your status online meaning you have to rely on mailings if you get them. But we all know they don't send statements

well it's impossible currently to reach the online tech desk associated with the IRS

I Careless about America... nothing Proof.

Wow is not fair 🆘

horrible

Ireland Ireland Latest News, Ireland Ireland Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Is A Private Company’s Automated Dialing Making It Impossible To Reach The IRS?Depending on whom you ask, Call EnQ, which charges a minimum of $100 a month, is either a brilliant solution for hardworking tax pros or it is effectively mounting a denial of service attack on IRS customer service lines. NO.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Is A Private Company’s Automated Dialing Making It Impossible To Reach The IRS?Depending on whom you ask, Call EnQ, which charges a minimum of $100 a month, is either a brilliant solution for hardworking tax pros or it is effectively mounting a denial of service attack on IRS customer service lines. NO.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »