A majority of Twitter’s shareholders have voted to approve Elon Musk’s $44 billion takeover. During a special meeting of shareholders that lasted about seven minutes, stockholders approved of two proposals: one to adopt the merger agreement with Musk, and one related to how the company’s executives will be compensated as a result of the deal.
Both measures were approved, though Twitter will disclose the final breakdown of votes “at a later date” when it files paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission.in Delaware’s Court of Chancery will determine whether Musk is able to terminate the agreement.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Good! Twitter hopefully will go unwoke now
Can't actually get through to your site due to the cookie pop ups.
👎👎👎
No
The fall out is going to be great
Chuckle. No way he buys it for that now.
Q is... Why, why the FUCK WHY⁉️ 👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 Twitter World don't want him 👎🏾
Ahahaha losers
Make him do it judge
Bye bye twitter
Ireland Ireland Latest News, Ireland Ireland Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Twitter shareholders vote in favor of Elon Musk's $44 billion takeover deal | CNN BusinessTwitter shareholders have voted in favor of Elon Musk’s $44 billion takeover deal, a value of $54.20 per share. The vote came days after Musk’s third letter to Twitter seeking to terminate their deal. I voted no MUSK - Try telling your twitter base what your gonna do about the psychotic crypto scammer base all over twitter? you think boys are a problem. just wait. Lol make him pay the 44 billion. Then twitter followers need to go to a new platform. And leave republicans and maga with twitter. Then guess what will happen. Lol it will be like truth social. And will be worthless. Because maga won’t have nobody to talk to !
Source: cnni - 🏆 326. / 59 Read more »
Twitter Whistleblower: Company Shrugged at Foreign Spies on StaffThe former security chief, who was fired by Twitter earlier this year, alleged that Twitter lacked “basic, fundamental tools and access control,” making it challenging to determine when sensitive data may have been compromised—and by whom. I think we users all know of Twitter’s limits. It should do better, especially about bots & repeating false information. But the careful user pays attention to sourcing. Hey Twitter, are any SPIES reading this? But he was the chief of security so why didn’t he fix things?
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »