The Competition Bureau responded to the tribunal’s decision in a brief statement Thursday.
But the tribunal rejected those arguments, saying the three-way arrangement stipulates that Shaw would first transfer Freedom to Videotron, and that Rogers would only then acquire the remainder of Shaw through an amalgamation arrangement. The tribunal also concluded that the merger and divestiture likely wouldn’t result in materially lower levels of non-price competition — namely service, quality, variety and innovation — relative to what would likely exist in the absence of the arrangement.
Freedom emerged as a sticking point, as the brand’s success was seen in Ottawa as proof that a fourth player could keep BCE’s Bell, Rogers and Telus on their toes. “Videotron is an experienced market disrupter that has achieved substantial success in Quebec,” the tribunal said. “It has drawn upon that experience to develop very detailed and fully costed plans for its entry into and expansion within the relevant markets in Alberta and British Columbia, as well as in Ontario.”Article contentlikely will be priced the same as what bundled offerings of Shaw Mobile and Freedom would have cost in the absence of the merger.
“It bears underscoring that there will continue to be four strong competitors in the wireless markets in Alberta and British Columbia, namely, Bell, Telus, Rogers and Videotron, just as there is today,” the ruling said.Article content
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Ireland Ireland Latest News, Ireland Ireland Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Competition Tribunal clears path for Rogers-Shaw mergerThe Competition Tribunal has dismissed an application from Canada's competition watchdog, clearing the way for Rogers Communications Inc.'s proposed $26-billion purchase of Shaw Communications Inc. The CRTCeng is such a garbage organization So the competition tribunal doesn’t actually do anything is what I take from this story ? Canada fucking sucks Nothing says fair competition like furthering the oligopoly 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »
Competition Tribunal clears path for Rogers-Shaw mergerThe Competition Tribunal has dismissed an application from Canada’s competition watchdog, clearing the way for Rogers Communications Inc.’s proposed $26-billion purchase of Shaw Communications Inc. lol competition tribunal is confused about the definition of 'competition' then WTF What did you expect. This is Canada. The land of low information voters
Source: TorontoStar - 🏆 60. / 55 Read more »
Competition Tribunal approves Rogers-Shaw merger, making Trudeau government the final obstacleIn a decision released late on Dec. 29, the three\u002Dmember tribunal rejected arguments that combining the two telecom giants would substantially lessen wireless… Joke Once again was proved that if you have enough money to spend the success is guaranteed, regardless. There is no consumers protection, this is just a farce. Consumers, brace yourself for what’s to come! This competition mockery will drive the price only⬆️ Just as well disband that useless waste
Source: financialpost - 🏆 7. / 85 Read more »
Competition Tribunal clears path for Rogers-Shaw mergerThe Competition Tribunal has dismissed an application from Canada\u0027s competition watchdog seeking to block Rogers\u0027 proposed purchase of Shaw. This is not good. Great, now all Shaw customers are going to get Rogered. woof Oh, okay, they said it will be better for consumers, approved. What a joke this government is.
Source: TheTorontoSun - 🏆 23. / 68 Read more »