sentences from human writers — often Red Ventures competitors, but sometimes sites it owns as well — near-verbatim, while shaking up the syntax a bit to throw plagiarism detectors off the scent. After we askedabout the issue, it edited numerous articles to replace what it called "phrases that were not entirely original."
"So, just for funzies, I want y'all to see how quickly AI-generated content happens. I'm hoping it'll incentivize some of you to send some ideas our way," he wrote in a Slack message last year, before the controversy. He added that he and another employee had "created 90 pages of blurb content in about a day. Each of these 250 blurbs is unique.
He also talked about ways Red Ventures could fool Google by mangling the AI-generated content further, seemingly referencing efforts that were already underway at the company.sneak by is by infusing data in the prompts , such that the data creates content that an AI detector might get confused by."
How is this different than the farms of SEO copywriters generating unoriginal content like blogs and listicles? Content generated by non-experts filled with misleading or useless info written so as to game Google rankings isn't new. GPT makes it more efficient and affordable.
Booooooo shut up!!! All you do is complain!