Poultry companies ask judge to dismiss ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed

  • 📰 wjxt4
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 27 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 63%

ایران اخبار اخبار

ایران آخرین اخبار,ایران سرفصلها

A group of poultry producers, including the world’s largest, are asking a federal judge to dismiss his ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed.

FILE - A Tyson food product is seen in Montpelier, Vt., Nov. 18, 2011. The world's largest poultry producer and other poultry companies are asking a federal judge to dismiss his ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed. Arkansas-based Tyson Foods, Minnesota-based Cargill Inc. and the others say in a motion filed Thursday, Oct. 26, 2023, that the case is constitutionally moot because the evidence is now more than 13 years old.

The filing said Oklahoma conservation officials have noted a steady decline in pollution. It credited improved wastewater treatment plants, state laws requiring poultry-litter management plans and fewer poultry farms as a result of growing metropolitan areas in northwest Arkansas. “The Court’s findings and conclusions rest upon a record compiled in 2005–2009,” the poultry companies' motion stated. “When this Court issued its findings and conclusions ... much of the record dated from the 1990s and early 2000s.”

این خبر را خلاصه کرده ایم تا بتوانید سریع آن را بخوانید. اگر به خبر علاقه مند هستید، می توانید متن کامل را اینجا بخوانید. ادامه مطلب:

 /  🏆 246. in İR
 

از نظر شما متشکرم. نظر شما پس از بررسی منتشر خواهد شد.

ایران آخرین اخبار, ایران سرفصلها

Similar News:همچنین می توانید اخبار مشابهی را که از منابع خبری دیگر جمع آوری کرده ایم، بخوانید.

Poultry companies ask judge to dismiss ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershedA group of poultry producers, including the world’s largest, are asking a federal judge to dismiss his ruling that they polluted an Oklahoma watershed. Arkansas-based Tyson Foods, Minnesota-based Cargill Inc. and the others say in a motion filed Thursday that the case is “constitutionally moot” because the evidence is now more than 13 years old. U.
منبع: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 ادامه مطلب »