Senate confirms protege of industry-friendly Mick Mulvaney to head Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 82%

Italia Notizia Notizia

Italia Ultime Notizie,Italia Notizie

The Senate has narrowly confirmed White House aide Kathy Kraninger to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Experts predict a continuation of the industry-friendly shift the CFPB has taken since Trump installed an acting director last year.

Abbiamo riassunto questa notizia in modo che tu possa leggerla velocemente. Se sei interessato alla notizia puoi leggere il testo completo qui. Leggi di più:

 /  🏆 11. in İT
 

Grazie per il tuo commento. Il tuo commento verrà pubblicato dopo essere stato esaminato.

Another creature for the swamp.

Majority, majority, majority: 'That’s what Senate Democrats fear. None voted to confirm her as director of the powerful, independent agency. The final was tally was 50-49, with only Republicans supporting the nomination.'

Is 'narrowly confirmed' the same as conformation?

Good CFPB has been nothing but corruption, time to taper its activities.

The CFPB is an unconstitutional fraud with no oversight that was used during the Obama administration to shake down businesses to fund far left NGO's. Shut it down.

Donald Trump Caught On Tape With Sexy Russian Spy Maria Butina; NEW EPISODE OF 'BE LESS STUPID'

Oh well, what's one more unqualified ninny in the Administration at this point?

Italia Ultime Notizie, Italia Notizie

Similar News:Puoi anche leggere notizie simili a questa che abbiamo raccolto da altre fonti di notizie.

Senate Confirms Trump Official as Consumer-Finance RegulatorThe Senate has approved Kathy Kraninger to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, putting a full-time Trump-appointed official in charge of the agency for the first time. UNQUALIFIED !!!!!! The GOP continuing to dick over the public 👍 Good. Maybe she’s there to shut this waste of💰 down. If so, she’s probably overqualified.
Fonte: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Leggi di più »