A federal judge in California hinted Friday that Google, Meta, Snap and TikTok could very likely have to face allegations by consumers that the social media companies harmed young Americans’ mental health with addictive features built into their respective platforms — and that Big Tech’s signature liability shield, known as Section 230, may not be enough to deflect those claims.
Addressing lawyers for both the consumer plaintiffs as well as the tech companies on Friday, District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the US District Court for the Northern District of California said she was unpersuaded by arguments that either all of the claims should be thrown out, or none of them. She also expressed skepticism in response to claims by industry lawyers that tech companies have no legal obligation to ensure their platforms are safe for children.
Italia Ultime Notizie, Italia Notizie
Similar News:Puoi anche leggere notizie simili a questa che abbiamo raccolto da altre fonti di notizie.
Tech companies, big bank slash hundreds more Bay Area jobs as layoffs widenTech companies and a big bank have slashed a combined hundreds more jobs in the Bay Area.
Leggi di più »
U.S. stocks post back-to-back drop as big tech shares tumbleJoy Wiltermuth is a news editor and senior markets reporter based in San Francisco.
Leggi di più »
‘Big Short’ Michael Burry takes a victory lap after calling the tech-led market correctionMichael Burry, best known for calling the subprime mortgage crisis, added a new notch in his belt by predicting the latest market correction.
Leggi di più »
California Becomes Epicenter for Tech Industry Legal BattlesLearn the legal foundation for the multi-state action against Meta Platforms. This includes subject matter jurisdiction under COPPA, state law claims, and more.
Leggi di più »