Santam’s offer of three months for business interruption claims ‘unconscionable’

  • 📰 TheCitizen_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 75%

日本 ニュース ニュース

日本 最新ニュース,日本 見出し

Santam has said that each policyholder will need to take it to court individually if they want more than the three month's settlement, in a move that is being criticised as showing a lack of respect for their customers, the judiciary and the FSCA.

Santam’s full and final settlement offer, to pay out three months of business interruption insurance when policyholders are covered for longer periods, is unconscionable, says specialist public loss adjuster, Insurance Claims Africa .

According to ICA, it is not surprised, but disappointed by Santam’s decision to limit its full and final settlement offers to three months, while there is an appeal pending at the SCA regarding the indemnity period, which is the period of time policy holders can claim for. “After almost seven months of legal wrangling, constant delays and Santam’s dogged refusal to pay its customers’ business interruption claims, Santam has conceded it is liable and that it will commence the process of assessing claims.

“The problem for Santam is that they have a judgment against them in the Ma-Afrika matter, which orders the insurer to pay for the full indemnity period of 18 months. This should not be ignored. The only way for them to treat their customers fairly is to offer an interim payment of three months and leave the balance to be dealt with after the SCA appeal.”

このニュースをすぐに読めるように要約しました。ニュースに興味がある場合は、ここで全文を読むことができます。 続きを読む:

 /  🏆 6. in JP
 

コメントありがとうございます。コメントは審査後に公開されます。

What more could go wrong for SantamInsurance policy holders. Shameful to delay honoring claims despite instructions from Regulator FSCA_ZA and Courts and now haggling over the quantum. NotSoGoodAndProperAfterAll InsurersFailTourism SantamInsurance

lets expise these companies

😭😤

日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し