Commentary: Have market forces really decided men’s tennis is more valuable than women's tennis?

  • 📰 ChannelNewsAsia
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 31 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 66%

日本 ニュース ニュース

日本 最新ニュース,日本 見出し

Decisions, like scheduling women's matches when spectator numbers are at their lowest, influence which players are given the best chance of breaking through to a mass audience, says the Financial Times' John Burn-Murdoch.

and men are also given more tournaments to play in.

And in April, while the two biggest women’s tournaments offered just over US$250,000 in prize money, the men’s gave out almost US$1.4 million. It is also unclear why more time on the court should necessarily mean a better spectacle. Few of the highest-quality Grand Slam finals have gone to a deciding set and, if time was money, then Nicolas Mahut and John Isner would be the highest-paid tennis players of all time.The second response to these figures is that the free market has decided that men’s tennis is a more valuable product. But events at last month’s French Open show the holes in this theory.

このニュースをすぐに読めるように要約しました。ニュースに興味がある場合は、ここで全文を読むことができます。 続きを読む:

 /  🏆 6. in JP
 

コメントありがとうございます。コメントは審査後に公開されます。

日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し