They have become even more fashionable following #Metoo, Black Lives Matter and corporate Canada’s increasing focus on trans and Black, Indigenous and people of colour rights.
It is particularly embarrassing, or should be, if a company’s conduct finds its way into court and its “woke,” do-good pronouncements are found by a judge to be inconsistent with their conduct. But that do-gooder spirit seemed to evade it, escaping the probe of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in its dissection of
He was his father’s caregiver for his first 11 months of employment until his father’s death in April 2017. In that same month, Luckman was diagnosed with cancer and forced to take a medical leave to surgically remove eight lymph nodes. He returned six months later only to be fired the very next month.
Bell made the mistake of initially arguing that he was fired because his performance did not meet expectations, claiming that he was “likeable but underperformed.” Various emails and other documents were used to show this poor performance. But the adjudicator noted that there were no emails produced regarding any of his peers, concluding, “In my view, this evidence was cherry-picked by Bell to reflect negatively on Mr.
As the Tribunal concluded, “ explanation seems contrived after not being able to support their original rationale of poor performance by Mr. Luckman as the reason for termination.”
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
ソース: ottawasuncom - 🏆 4. / 92 続きを読む »