It's a scathing, but also perhaps insightful, analysis of a burgeoning field that, at the very least, still has a lot to prove.Despite billions of dollars being poured into quantum computing, Gourianov argues, the industry has yet to develop a single product that's actuallyThat means these firms are collecting orders of magnitude more in financing than they're able to earn in actual revenue — a growing bubble that could eventually burst.
"The little revenue they generate mostly comes from consulting missions aimed at teaching other companies about 'how quantum computers will help their business,'" Gourianov wrote for the, "as opposed to genuinely harnessing any advantages that quantum computers have over classical computers." Contemporary quantum computers are also "so error-prone that any information one tries to process with them will almost instantly degenerate into noise," he wrote, which scientists have been
Advance science without utility. That’s totally cool.
AnsisEgle Kinda like in the early days of electricity - “What kind of BS is this?! You can’t hold electricity in your hand or put it in your pocket… what good can come from that?!”
SimplifiedIct Because it's heavily state funded high risk research, duh. Wow Oxford quantum physicists aren't very savvy about economics
LOL The funny part is those skeptics will benefit the most. The true innovators will be lucky to build families.
The computational stretch, might come from filling the errors with starch of open possibilities; giving length , depth, texture and random alternatives for a concept to grasp the full meaning of diminished omnipotence.
BUT BUT.. They said it’s the Blockchain Killer